Will Nebraska Make the NCAA Tournament?
For decades, Nebraska basketball has lived in the shadow of its football powerhouse, forever teetering between irrelevance and false hope. Yet, 2025 presents a uniquely tantalizing question — will Nebraska finally break through and earn a spot in the NCAA Tournament? The answer, depending on who you ask, is either inevitable or laughable.
Nebraska’s resume is a Rorschach test for basketball pundits. The Cornhuskers have secured several quality Big Ten wins, holding court at home against ranked foes and showing flashes of brilliance with fast-paced offense and gritty defensive stands. Yet, their road record — riddled with embarrassing collapses against bottom-feeders — tarnishes the narrative. Bubble teams live and die by consistency, and Nebraska has been anything but.
Statistically, Nebraska’s NET ranking hovers just inside the bubble conversation. They boast a few Quad 1 victories — the currency of Selection Sunday — but a slew of Quad 3 losses act like cement shoes dragging them down. Analysts are split. Metrics-driven pundits argue the numbers work in Nebraska’s favor if chaos reigns in conference tournaments, but traditionalists scoff, citing the Huskers’ inability to win when it truly matters.
Head coach Fred Hoiberg, once seen as a savior, now faces questions about whether his NBA-inspired system can work in the bruising Big Ten. His offensive schemes hum when shots fall, but when the three-point well dries up, Nebraska looks more like a mid-major than a tournament contender. Critics argue Nebraska’s system is too soft, too reliant on finesse in a conference defined by trench warfare.
Even more controversial is Nebraska’s reputation. The program’s lack of historical relevance creates an unspoken bias. When the committee debates last-four-in scenarios, will Nebraska’s mediocrity cloud objective analysis? In a world where brand matters, the Cornhuskers’ name does them no favors. They are not Indiana. They are not Michigan State. They are Nebraska — a program with zero NCAA Tournament wins in its history.
But let’s flip the script. What if Nebraska shouldmake the tournament? Their non-conference scheduling was bold, with a handful of competitive games against tournament-caliber teams. Their ability to occasionally punch up, stunning top-tier Big Ten teams, hints at untapped potential. The eye test, that mythical metric no algorithm can capture, shows a team that — on the right day — looks capable of upsetting anyone.
The real controversy? Some believe the NCAA would love to see Nebraska in the tournament. It’s fresh blood, a compelling story. A tortured fanbase longing for relevance. The narrative value alone — Nebraska’s first tournament win — is rating gold. There’s no evidence of bias in the selection process, but in a system built by humans, storytelling inevitably seeps in.
So, will Nebraska make the NCAA Tournament? They probably shouldn’t. But they just might.
In college basketball, the line between deserving and desirable has never been thinner.
Want me to make it even more controversial or add some hot takes?
