Myles Garrett’s Record-Breaking Deal: A Bold Move for the Cleveland Browns’ Future
The Cleveland Browns have made waves with the recent announcement of Myles Garrett’s historic contract extension, making him the highest-paid non-quarterback player in NFL history with a deal worth $40 million per year. This move has sparked a debate among fans and analysts alike: is this a brilliant investment in the future, or should the Browns have considered trading their star defensive end for a package that would have launched a rebuild? As the team heads into a critical phase, this decision will undoubtedly shape the trajectory of the franchise for years to come.
A Franchise Cornerstone
At first glance, it’s easy to see why the Browns would opt to secure Garrett’s future in Cleveland. Since being selected as the first overall pick in the 2017 NFL Draft, Garrett has become one of the most dominant defensive players in the league. With a mix of raw athleticism, pass-rushing prowess, and leadership qualities, Garrett has consistently been a game-changer for the Browns. His presence on the field elevates the entire defense, and his ability to disrupt opposing offenses has been a major factor in Cleveland’s defensive success in recent seasons.
Garrett’s numbers speak for themselves. As of the 2024 season, he has accumulated over 70 sacks, establishing himself as one of the most feared edge rushers in the league. The Browns, who have historically struggled to find sustained success, can count on Garrett to provide stability on the defensive side of the ball, which is a rare commodity in the NFL.
For a team like Cleveland, who has often been in search of a true defensive identity, locking down Garrett is an important move. His leadership and ability to attract attention from opposing offenses make him a key piece in any long-term plans. In this regard, the Browns’ decision to pay Garrett handsomely aligns with the notion of building around a foundational player—one who can be the face of their defense for the next decade.
Should They Have Traded Him?
On the flip side, some may argue that the Browns should have traded Garrett for a massive return, potentially kicking off a rebuild from the ground up. Cleveland, despite flashes of promise, has yet to consistently compete for playoff berths or championships. With an aging roster, uncertain quarterback play, and a division that includes teams like the Cincinnati Bengals and Baltimore Ravens, the Browns may not be in a position to contend for a Super Bowl in the immediate future.
Trading Garrett for multiple first-round picks or a package of young talent could have provided the team with the resources to accelerate a rebuild. A high draft pick or a young quarterback might be the key to unlocking the team’s long-term potential. Moreover, Garrett’s contract, while deserving, could become an obstacle if the Browns are unable to put the right pieces around him to make a deep playoff run.
The Bottom Line
Ultimately, the decision to pay Garrett or trade him comes down to the Browns’ vision for the future. While the idea of a rebuild has its merits, there’s a risk involved in trading away your best player. Building a competitive team in the NFL is never easy, and players of Garrett’s caliber don’t come around often. If the Browns can continue to add key pieces to their roster, Garrett’s presence could help elevate the team into playoff contention.
For now, keeping Garrett as the centerpiece of the defense might just be the right move. His value on the field is undeniable, and his contract represents a commitment to the future of the franchise. As Cleveland continues to work toward a championship, having Garrett locked in for years to come is a crucial step in the right direction.
In the end, it’s about finding balance—building a competitive team while retaining cornerstone players like Garrett who can make a difference on Sundays. For the Cleveland Browns, the next few seasons will reveal whether this decision pays off or if it becomes a cautionary tale of missed opportunity.
