đ˘ Season Recap & National Standing
Michigan State completed the 2024â25 regular season with a solid 22â10 overall record and an 11â7 mark in BigâŻTen play, placing them in a threeâway tie for fifth in the conference . Under second-year head coach RobynâŻFralick, the Spartans earned an atâlarge NCAA Tournament bid as a 7âseed in the Spokane region of the bracket .
In the NCAA Tournament, MSU achieved a first-round victory over Harvard before falling to No.âŻ2 seed NCâŻState in the second round .
Despite these accomplishments, MSU did not make the final Associated Press TopâŻ25. In the final AP Poll released AprilâŻ7, Michigan State was not among the ranked teams, though Michigan (their inâstate rival) held the No.âŻ25 spot, earning 37 points and moving up from the previous week . MSU received just 16 votesâplacing them among the âOthers receiving votesâ but clearly outside the TopâŻ25 .
—
đ Poll Trajectory Throughout the Season
According to the AP Poll archive, MSU had a season of ups and downs:
They started the season unranked, first receiving âOthers receiving votesâ status (RV) with 16 points before climbing gradually .
MSU cracked the TopâŻ25 for the first time on DecemberâŻ2, entering at No.âŻ24 after an unbeaten start through eight games .
They peaked at No.âŻ15 on DecemberâŻ16 (10â0 start), reaching a careerâhigh ranking .
After conference play began, the team fluctuated, dropping as low as No.âŻ24 and falling out of rankings by MarchâŻ10 and again after MarchâŻ17 .
This rollerâcoaster reflects how strong nonâconference form propelled them temporarily into the polls, while tougher BigâŻTen matchups nudged them out as the season progressed.
—
đĄ Why They Missed the Final 25
Three major factors led to MSU missing the final AP TopâŻ25:
1. Powerful opponent imbalance: The BigâŻTen boasted strong teams like Maryland, Ohio State, Michigan, and Indianaâall listed in the final pollâmaking upward movement difficult .
2. Tournament performance: A secondâround exit in both the BigâŻTen and NCAA tournaments limited national exposure and momentum.
3. Competitive final ballot: The final AP rankings featured teams like Michigan, West Virginia, SDSU, and Oklahoma State in the 21â25 range, leaving limited space for MSU .
Still, earning votes signifies national attentionâeven without a TopâŻ25 finish.
—
đŻ Looking Ahead
Consistency will be key next season: sustaining high-level performance throughout BigâŻTen play could translate into a stable TopâŻ25 presence.
Tournament advancement: Breaking beyond the second round in March would provide a boost in national perception.
Recruiting & development: Building on RobynâŻFralickâs recruiting foundation could bring the talent needed to push into returning-finalâpoll status.
—
đ Summary
In conclusion, Michigan State finished the 2024â25 season as âOthers receiving votesâ in the final AP Poll (16 points), not within the official TopâŻ25. Their season featured:
Achievement Detail
AP presence Peaked at No.âŻ15 midâDecember
Final poll status Unranked, with 16 votes
NCAA outcome Firstâround win, secondâround exit
Final record 22â10 overall; 11â7 BigâŻTen
MSUâs journey reflects both promise and the challenge of maintaining national relevance in a deep BigâŻTen and NCAA landscape. With continued growth, theyâre poised to chase a return to TopâŻ25 rankings next season under Coach Fralick.