Henderson vs. Marchiol: Simulated Outcomes for Each WVU QB in EA Sports College Football 26
As excitement builds for EA Sports College Football 26, fans are already debating who should lead the West Virginia Mountaineers at quarterback—Garrett Greene’s departure leaves a void, and two names stand out in simulated scenarios: Nicco Marchiol and true freshman Sean Henderson.
In head-to-head simulations using EA Sports College Football 26 rosters, Marchiol often emerged as the steadier, more experienced option. With a deep knowledge of WVU’s system and a controlled passing game, simulations showed Marchiol leading the Mountaineers to a 9-3 regular season. He posted solid stats—around 2,700 passing yards, 22 touchdowns, and 8 interceptions—highlighting his game-manager style and ability to keep drives alive.
Henderson, on the other hand, proved to be a wild card. Though raw and still adjusting to the college pace, his upside flashed in a big way. In alternate simulations where he earned the starting nod, WVU’s season was less consistent but often more explosive. The team’s simulated record fluctuated between 7-5 and 10-2 depending on turnovers and defensive support. Henderson threw for over 3,000 yards and 28 touchdowns in some runs, but also had double-digit interceptions due to riskier throws and inexperience.
Both quarterbacks offer distinct advantages. Marchiol is safe, smart, and polished, while Henderson is electric, unpredictable, and potentially program-changing. EA’s simulated outcomes don’t provide a definitive answer but instead mirror what WVU fans are likely to witness in real life: a classic battle between proven reliability and exciting potential.
As fall camp nears, the digital gridiron gives fans a taste of what could be—but ultimately, it’ll be Neal Brown and his staff who decide whose name gets called first in Mo
rgantown.
