Salt Lake Tribune Hit with Backlash Over BYU Sports NIL Piece
The Salt Lake Tribune, one of Utah’s most prominent news outlets, has found itself at the center of a heated controversy after publishing a recent piece examining the role of Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) deals within Brigham Young University’s athletic programs. What was intended to be an in-depth look at the evolving landscape of college athletics has instead sparked sharp criticism from BYU fans, alumni, and even some current players who argue that the coverage was biased and unfairly negative.
The article in question delved into the influence of NIL collectives and donor networks surrounding BYU, raising questions about transparency, fairness, and the long-term impact of NIL compensation on recruiting and team culture. While the Tribune highlighted potential concerns—such as whether wealthy boosters create unequal opportunities between athletes and whether BYU’s strong church-affiliated community gives it unique advantages—many readers felt the framing was designed to cast suspicion on BYU rather than simply inform.
Backlash was immediate across social media platforms. BYU supporters, including high-profile alumni, pushed back against the Tribune’s tone, accusing the paper of harboring a long-standing bias against the university. “This isn’t investigative journalism; it’s targeted negativity,” one former BYU athlete posted on X (formerly Twitter). Others argued that the paper overlooked the positive stories of how NIL has benefited Cougar athletes, helping them fund education, support families, and engage in charitable efforts.
The criticism also highlighted a deeper cultural divide within Utah. For decades, the Salt Lake Tribune has walked a delicate line covering BYU, the flagship university of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Fans often feel the paper’s coverage leans skeptical or adversarial, while Tribune reporters counter that their responsibility is to hold powerful institutions accountable. In this case, many BYU loyalists saw the NIL story as another example of unfair scrutiny.
Several BYU collectives and boosters have since responded publicly, pointing out that the school’s approach to NIL is both compliant with NCAA rules and consistent with the values of its community. They highlighted examples of players who used NIL earnings to fund charitable work, launch small businesses, or cover living expenses that scholarship funds did not fully address. In their view, NIL has empowered athletes rather than undermined the program’s integrity.
In response to the backlash, the Tribune defended its reporting, emphasizing that the piece was intended to spark discussion about broader national issues tied to NIL, not to single out BYU unfairly. Editors noted that NIL is a new and evolving frontier in college sports, one that demands close examination everywhere—not just in Provo. Still, the paper acknowledged the passionate reactions and reaffirmed its commitment to balanced coverage moving forward.
The dust-up underscores just how sensitive the NIL debate has become, particularly at faith-based institutions like BYU, where questions of money, influence, and tradition intersect. As the NIL era continues to reshape college athletics, the tension between media scrutiny and fan loyalty is likely to grow. For BYU, the backlash may ultimately serve as a rallying point—another chapter in its long history of defending its values and athletes against outside criticism.
–
