The Florida Panthers are facing sharp criticism after awarding forward Sam Bennett a massive $64 million contract, with analysts calling the deal a “reckless overpay” and a potentially damaging move for the franchise’s long-term financial flexibility. The contract, which averages $8 million annually, has left many questioning the front office’s decision-making, especially given Bennett’s inconsistent production and injury concerns.
Bennett, while a physical presence and a key piece during the Panthers’ recent playoff runs, has never reached the point-per-game mark in a full NHL season. Critics argue that while his grit and two-way play add value, his offensive output doesn’t justify a contract that places him among the league’s higher-paid forwards. With Florida already tight against the salary cap and looking to maintain a championship-caliber roster, the move could limit their ability to retain or add other crucial pieces in the future.
“Hitching that kind of long-term money to a middle-six forward with durability questions is incredibly risky,” one NHL analyst remarked. “This deal looks more emotional than strategic.”
Supporters of the deal point to Bennett’s leadership qualities, playoff toughness, and chemistry with core players as reasons the Panthers felt compelled to lock him up. Still, others argue that comparable players could have been signed for significantly less, allowing the team more roster-building flexibility.
As the NHL salary landscape continues to evolve, the Bennett contract will be under a microscope—especially if his production fails to match the dollar amount. For now, it’s a high-stakes gamble that could either pay off with continued deep playoff runs or turn into a cautionary tale of overcommitting to a gritty but replaceable
asset.
