🚨 Former Penn State Wrestler Joins Epic Antitrust Lawsuit Against UFC—Could This Change MMA Forever?

🚨 Former Penn State Wrestler Joins Epic Antitrust Lawsuit Against UFC—Could This Change MMA Forever?

A surprising new twist emerged this week: a former Penn State wrestler has officially filed an antitrust lawsuit against the UFC, joining over 1,200 fellow fighters in a bold legal attack on the promotion’s business model.

This case builds on the landmark Le v. Zuffa class action, where athletes have alleged that the UFC abused its market dominance—using monopolistic contracts, exclusive terms, and acquisitions—to suppress fighter pay and limit competition .

📌 Why This Lawsuit Matters:

A Big Legal Win Already in Hand: A federal judge recently approved a record-setting $375 million settlement, sending $240–260 million to fighters who competed between 2010–2017 .

But Justice Still in Progress: Unlike prior suits, this new lawsuit seeks to change the structure—not just claim payouts. Plaintiffs want future contracts to include free agency rights and eliminate forever-binding clauses .

👥 What This Means for MMA:

Fighters want more than just cash—they’re fighting for long-term freedom and fair negotiating power.

The UFC’s mega-merger into TKO Group (with WWE) means any legal setback could force system-wide reforms .

This lawsuit could inspire similar cases in boxing, wrestling, or even college sports, pushing the limits of antitrust law .

🔍 What to Watch:

1. Will contract structures change? Could clauses tying fighters indefinitely to UFC be outlawed?

2. Can former or current athletes win injunctive relief? The second lawsuit (Johnson v. Zuffa) seeks court orders, not just money.

3. Will Penn State’s wrestler inspire others? His presence adds credibility and may attract broader athlete support.

This isn’t just a lawsuit—it’s a fight for athlete empowerment and structural change in combat sports. And with a former NCAA wrestler from Penn State in the mix, the stakes just got personal—and national.