The landscape of college athletics is shifting once again, with power conferences moving to take control of athlete compensation policies. This change, which aims to regulate and streamline the Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) process, could significantly benefit programs like Ohio State—an institution known for its strong compliance track record and ethical approach to recruiting and development.
A New Era of NIL Oversight
Under the proposed framework, power conferences would establish an independent entity to oversee athlete compensation, replacing the NCAA’s traditionally slow and inconsistent enforcement methods. This system would include a salary cap management system, an NIL clearinghouse, and a dedicated investigative unit to monitor compliance. By centralizing these functions, the goal is to create a fairer playing field where schools that follow the rules—such as Ohio State—aren’t placed at a disadvantage compared to those willing to bend them.
Ohio State’s Compliance History and Competitive Edge
Since the fallout from the 2010 “Tattoogate” scandal, Ohio State has developed one of the most robust compliance departments in college athletics. The program has consistently prioritized adherence to regulations, self-reporting minor infractions, and ensuring that its operations align with evolving NCAA guidelines. As a result, the Buckeyes are well-prepared to thrive in a more regulated NIL environment.
Programs that have engaged in aggressive spending tactics to secure top recruits—sometimes skirting ethical boundaries—may face tighter restrictions under the new system. This would level the playing field, ensuring that schools invest in player development rather than simply outspending their competition.
A Response to Growing Concerns in College Football
Beyond NIL regulation, this shift could also help address broader integrity concerns in the sport. Recent scandals, such as alleged improper scouting practices at rival programs, have raised questions about the NCAA’s ability to enforce its own rules. A more structured and transparent oversight system could lead to faster and more effective accountability, preventing teams from gaining unfair advantages.
Additionally, the proposed changes include penalties for non-compliance, such as financial fines, revenue-sharing reductions, and even suspensions for coaches and administrators. This heightened level of accountability would benefit programs that have long operated within the rules, allowing them to compete without the frustration of seeing rival teams evade consequences for rule-breaking.
A Win for Ohio State and College Football
For Ohio State fans, this regulatory shift represents a promising development. By reinforcing fair competition, ensuring responsible NIL spending, and increasing accountability across college athletics, these changes could help maintain the integrity of the game. The Buckeyes, with their strong foundation of compliance and commitment to ethical recruiting, are positioned to excel under this new framework.
As college football continues to evolve, Ohio State’s disciplined approach to success may serve as a model for other programs navigating the future of athlete compensation.
